Former Crispin Porter & Bogusky chief creative officer Ralph Watson is suing his old company in the wake of his Diet Madison Avenue lawsuit.
Court documents filed late last week show Watson is suing the MDC Partners firm on a number of grounds including age discrimination, intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy.
A spokesperson for CP+B said the agency “stands by its decision to terminate Mr. Watson’s employment in February 2018.”
“MDC Partners and CP+B intend to vigorously defend themselves and their employees against the litigation commenced on June 29 2018 by Mr. Watson.”
It comes weeks after he filed a lawsuit against the anonymous Instagram account for defamation following his termination of employment at Crispin, first reported by Campaign US.
The documents, registered in the Superior Court of California of the County of Los Angeles, accuse Diet Madison Avenue, as well as Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and Does 3 through 100, of defamation, intentional interference with contractual relations, intentional interference with prospective economic relations and negligent interference with prospective economic relations.
On February 2, Watson was let go from his role at MDC Partners’ CP+B after working at the agency since 2014. Watson has filed a claim with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, with the intent to sue CP+B for wrongdoing.
In early January, Diet Madison Avenue published a list of men in the advertising industry that it alleged to be sexual harassers, the document states, adding that Watson was not on that list.
The lawsuit claims that on January 19, Diet Madison Avenue posted the following statement on Instagram: “Ralph Watson. The women that you targeted & groomed (like all predators do), because they were young & just starting out their careers…the women that you assumed would stay quiet are stronger than you ever gave them credit for. And their voices have created a timeline. Going back years. Corroborated stories. Spanning across multiple agencies. And even continents.”
Watson was contacted by multiple colleagues and friends shortly after the comments were published, alerting him to the posts, the document adds.
Watson then contacted his employer’s HR director, and was told CP+B had received no credible complaints or evidence of sexual harassment against him, according to the lawsuit.
Watson was let go days later. He “has suffered loss of salary, benefits and additional amounts of money he would have received had he not been terminated,” and “has largely been unable to secure any work in the advertising industry since,” the lawsuit claims.
A spokesperson for Diet Madison Avenue told Campaign US: “We have legal representation. It will be fascinating to see how Instagram deals with this issue – and how they deal with users’ privacy and freedom of speech on their platform. It will set a precedent for what is and is not permitted on this platform during the #MeToo era.”
Diet Madison Avenue strongly urges the legal teams involved to contact the Electronic Frontier Front – a non-profit that defends digital privacy, free speech and innovation.
“Similar suits have always been dropped,” the spokesperson added.